At some point in your law school, you will be introduced to the IRAC method, especially when you are assigned a law assignment. The IRAC stands for Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion and considered as a foundation for legal writing. More importantly, legal writing requires the writer to analyse a set of facts by using legal rules that are gleaned from a myriad of sources such as statutes, cases, and secondary data. Unlike the non-legal writing, it has its own particular structure and parameters that you have to comply in your law assignments.
All lawyers write in the same manner with the help of laying out the issue to be discussed by following the legal rule relevant to the issue as well as the analysis of the pertinent facts based on that rule. They call it Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion (IRAC), Conclusion, Rule, Application, Conclusion (CARC), or Conclusion, Rule, Explanation, Application, Conclusion (CREAC).
In spite of the fact that this may sound palling at first, it will quickly become the second nature. Below is a guide by our law assignment writing services providers on how you can structure a legal argument with the help of IRAC.
Where to Use?
Most often the IRAC is used after the section of facts, such as “discussion section”, “your argument” or “memo section” of your brief. Every legal topic has its particular structure of IRAC under a separate sub-heading.
For instance, an affirmative defence and a necessary element of a claim would each receive their own complete, independent IRAC discussions.
How to Use?
A fully synthesised IRAC will allow you to move towards the case with the help of governing law and final conclusion. For instance, your client is from England and he is getting divorced. His wife argues that he did not reasonably and fairly disclose his property that is required by the “England and wales Law” because his disclosure stated his overall assets inaccurately. In a memo, you may analyse this concern by following the IRAC structure defined below.
Issue: This will be the topic of the case.
Rule: Here you will put the appropriate rule/legislation such as “Friezo v. Friezo, 914 A.2d 533, 545 (Conn. 2007)” in this case.
Analysis: Here you will interpret the evidence.
Conclusion: Here you will reconnect this point to your research and provide a final verdict based on the rules and facts.
The aforementioned is an in-depth guide on “IRAC method” and its use. Hopefully, the article provides you the enough information on the subject and would enable you to understand it from every aspect.
If you need further assistance, or want our law assignment writing experts to provide you with the best law assignments help, feel free to contact our customer support.